[QMSE] W01 - Classical Mechanics Review
- many CM (Classical Mechanics) concepts are still useful in understanding QM (Quantum Mechanics)
- discarding them will apparently increase the effort to understand QM
- QM also has to explain what CM can already explain
- specifically, understanding of waves and oscillations is very important
- energy and
- momentum hold as well
- a part of learning QM is parts of CM that are needed to build concepts of QM
- they are used differently than used in CM
- compared to the math, we do not need much physics
- partly because it is defining new physical concepts
- the core of quantum mechanics can be understood without the additional complexities of the physics of general relativity
- relativistic views of the world are provided by general world
Elementary Classical Mechanics (ECM)
- conceptually this is equivalent to
- newtonian classical mechanics (NCM)
- hamiltonian classical mechanics (HCM)
- lagrangian classical mechanics (LCM)
- HCM and LCM are mathematically more sophisticated in the way they express ECM
- NCM also distinguishes from RCM (Relativistic Classical Mechanics)
- only non-relativistic CM i.e. mass moving much slower than speed of light
- also distinguishes form QM
- photons travel at light speed
- but have no mass
- most of their physics can be handled with QM without relativistic complexities
momentum and kinetic energy
- for particle of mass \(m\)
- momentum is \( p = mv \)
- \(v\) is the velocity
- both \( v \) and \( p \) are both velocities
- energy due to motion is kinetic energy
- \( KE = \frac{p^2}{2m} \)
- \( p^2 = p \times p \):
- vector product of momentum with itself
- in CM, kinetic energy can never be negative
potential energy
- energy due to position
- \(V \)
- units = Joules
- not to be confused with Voltage \(V\) whose units are Joules/Coulomb
- can be written as a function of position vector \( r \)
- \( V(r) \)
conservative-fields
- in CM, fields like which potential energy exists in
- are called conservative or irrotational fields
- the change in a potential energy around a closed path is \(0\)
- gravitational
- electrostatic
non-conservative fields
- going round a vortex i.e. water going around a bath tub drain
- a vortex field has a rotational aspect to it
- so the potential energy change along a closed path is not zero
- work has to be done to move against the field
- work will be done on by the field when going along with the field
hamiltonian
- the sum total of potential and kinetic energies
- written as a function of position and momentum
- is called the classical “Hamiltonian”
- denoted by “\(H\)”
- for a classical particle of mass \( m \) in a conservative potential \( V(r) \)
- \( H = \frac{p^2}{2m} + V(r) \)
- the zero chosen for potential energy is arbitrary
- there is not absolute origin for potential energy
- in both CM and QM
- only delta potential energy is worked with
- the zero has to be kept consistent
- there is however a best practice of choosing the origin to simplify the algebra
Force
- in CM, newton’s II law related force and acceleration
- \( F = ma \)
- \( F \): force
- \( m \): mass
- \( a \): acceleration
- equivalently force is the rate of change of momentum
-
\( F = \frac{dp}{dt} \)
- in QM, the idea of force is seldom used directly
- even if there is behavior that corresponds to force like in CM
- forced are setup as a gradient in the potential
force and potential energy
- assume a force \( F_{push x} \) driving a ball
- up a positive slope
- by distance \(\Delta x \) up the slope
- the change in potential energy \(V\)
- \( \Delta V = F_{push x}\Delta x \)
- this can also be twisted to be understood as
- \( F_{push x} = \frac{ \Delta V }{ \Delta x } \)
- in the infinitesimal limit: \( F_{push x} = \frac{ d V }{ d x } \)
- the direction of the force of the potential on the ball is downhill
- due to gravity
- so force due to gravity field \( F_{x} = - \frac{dV}{dx} \)
force as a vector
- use gradient operator to generalize force to three dimensions
- to construct the components along the three directions X, Y and Z
- \( F = -\nabla V = - \left[ \frac{\partial V}{\partial x} i + \frac{\partial V}{\partial y} j + \frac{\partial V}{\partial z} k \right] \)